Maintain New York City’s financial responsibility

New York City’s capital investments are primarily funded through the issuance of bonds, which are purchased by financial institutions and New Yorkers alike. The City’s strong economy, responsible budget practices, and sustainable levels of debt service put these bonds in high demand.

Since the late 1980’s, the City and fiscal monitoring agencies measure the debt service burden as a percentage of tax revenues. It is the best measure of debt burden because it puts debt service within the context of the City’s own resources. These credit strengths have a real impact on New Yorkers: a strong demand for bonds reduces the costs of maintaining roads, bridges, schools, and other capital investments, and saves taxpayers money.

This TYCS demonstrates our commitment to meeting legal mandates and enhancing the capacity and quality of our assets. Moreover, it maintains infrastructure that is critical to fostering long-term economic growth and improving quality of life for New Yorkers.

Debt Service Obligation

($ in billions)

Fiscal YearAnticipated Debt Service ObligationDebt Service as a Percentage of Tax Revenue
2020$7.311.5%
2021$7.611.7%
2022$8.312.4%
2023$9.113.1%
2024$9.613.4%
2025$10.113.5%
2026$10.513.5%
2027$10.813.3%
2028$11.013.0%
2029$11.112.6%
 

Debt Service as a Percentage of Tax Revenue

Fostering better interagency project coordination: From better scheduling of construction activity on the City’s streets to integrating storm water management plans into parks projects, the City is improving its planning and data-sharing practices to foster more efficient and effective capital investments. For example, the Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) coordinate on planning for street reconstruction projects, safety improvements, and sewer and water main upgrades and repairs. The Department of Design and Construction (DDC) has new Front End Planning Units which further facilitate communication between agencies to share project scoping, discuss state of good repair improvements, and identify project timelines that might benefit from coordinated project delivery. This coordinated work creates cost efficiencies, shortens project timelines and, most importantly, reduces disruption to communities from the construction work.

Coordination with Private Utilities

New York City’s streets typically have multiple private and public utilities running beneath them, including public water and sewer services and privately-owned electrical, steam, natural gas and telecommunications cabling. As a result, roadway repairs and improvements, and utility upgrades or repairs, often require coordinated street excavation. Coordinating all the public and private work activities required is critically important, as utility work is among the primary causes of delays to City-sponsored roadway reconstruction work.

New York City is committed to streamlining and centralizing capital work coordination across service providers, including utilities and telecommunication companies. Following on the successful effort to strengthen coordination between public and private entities while revitalizing Lower Manhattan after 9/11, we are strengthening working relationships among capital project planners through monthly scheduling and planning meetings, in addition to separate project-based meetings. We are also sharing digital maps showing locations of facilities and planned projects. Moreover, City agencies and private utilities are piloting joint construction of capital projects with a single contractor, which can yield significant savings by shortening the schedule and eliminating additional coordination needs. We expect that increased coordination will lead to more efficient construction overall, produce cost savings, and cause fewer street disruptions within communities.

Enhancing capital project procurement and implementation:

The City is prioritizing several improvements to procurement and implementation processes, including a) increasing transparency into the process for vendors and the public; b) ensuring efficiency and transparency in delivery; c) developing innovative designbuild programs for large-scale priority projects; d) reducing procurement cycle times; and e) enhancing cost estimation among the nearly $4 billion in construction procurement that occurs every year. For example, in January 2019, DDC released its strategic plan with key reforms and processes related to procurement and implementation of capital projects. DDC seeks to modernize the contract procurement process, improve evaluation and payment processes, and introduce better project management controls for efficient delivery of projects.

As another example, in April 2017, the Mayor’s Office of Contract Services (MOCS) released a new Procurement and Sourcing Solutions Portal (PASSPort) to improve the citywide procurement process. PASSPort is a user-friendly and interactive portal for both vendors and City agencies to find key resources, manage vendor accounts, submit information and track performance. It has replaced the existing paper based system, saving both vendors and City agencies considerable time and effort in doing business with the City

Design-Build

Currently, nearly all City capital projects require separate procurement for design and construction. The design contract needs to be completed before the construction contract is procured and finalized, and procurement timelines can take up to six months. As the size and complexity of the City’s capital portfolio continues to increase, expanding the range of tools available for effective and more tailored project-specific delivery is more critical than ever. To that end, another type of project delivery mechanism is design-build, in which a single contractor is hired to be responsible for both the design and the construction phases of a project. By having a single entity responsible for the project, design and construction planning can be done concurrently, which reduces project delivery schedules, improves cost estimation of materials and resources, and minimizes project risks. To date, the City has procured design-build authority for a limited number of projects. The City is continuing to advocate for the expansion of its design-build authority by improving bidding and project management processes to ensure critical capital projects are delivered within shorter timelines and at lower costs.

Continue to Principle 2: Promote forward-looking, holistic capital planning that anticipates neighbhorhood needs of tomorrow